#Merge develop branch into master git hub how to#
The worst-case scenario is someone merging a PR, pulling master, not finding the changes, and getting confused, which begs the question, how do you merge stacked PRs? How to merge stacked pull request Squash, merge, or rebase?
Make sure to clearly state that a PR is stacked on top of another. Notice that while master is set as the base of our PR, the changes from ts-setup (“Setup TypeScript” commit) are present, and our commit count is at two.Ĭhanging the base branch to ts-setup removes overlapping commits, bringing our commit count to just one. This effectively turns ts-setup and migrate-components into stacked branches ready to become stacked PRs. $ mv components/Button.jsx components/Button.tsx $ git checkout -b migrate-components # checkout from ts-setup Then, checkout the second branch from the first. In your GitHub repository, you’ll be prompted to create a pull request from ts-setup: $ git checkout -b ts-setup # checkout from master To stack two PRs, checkout the first branch from your base master (or develop) and push your changes. Stacking two branches is easier to handle than working on the same branch. This is especially handy when two people are trying to collaborate on the same feature. If page migration is dependent on components migration, you can stack the branches even further.
This means that if a change occurs in ts-setup, migrate-pages would have to merge or rebase ts-setup. This would allow the two branches, migrate-pages and migrate-components, to share the TypeScript configuration in a master-like relationship with the ts-setup branch. The TypeScript setup (dependency installation, tsconfig.json, etc.) would have to be shared between the two of you, either by eagerly committing the setup to the master (or develop) branch, or by stacking your PRs on top of a ts-setup feature branch. The other situation where stacked PRs really shine is when you want to use a particular change in two or more branches.įor instance, imagine wanting to migrate a codebase to TypeScript where you rewrite the pages in TS while your teammate rewrites the components. To make it easy for two people to work on the same featureĪs previously stated, stacked PRs are useful when wanting to split large pull requests.
#Merge develop branch into master git hub code#
To share a piece of code between multiple feature branches.So, what good is there in doing the same with your branches? When and why should you use stacked PRs? Having multiple commits is the better practice. You have the choice between pushing all your changes as a single big commit and organizing your code in separate commits. When working with stacked PRs, it’s helpful to think of your branches as a similar layer of code-change organization to git commits. In git terms, they are feature branches that are checked out from other feature branches to build small and coherent units to represent changes. Stacked PRs, also know as dependent, incremental, or chained PRs, are pull requests that branch off from other pull requests. In this article, we will cover what stacked pull requests are, when and how to use them, and how to convert a monolithic PR into a stacked one. So how can we introduce large changes while avoiding cognitively overloading our teammates? This is where stacked pull requests come into play. The same cannot be said for small PRs, however, where it’s much easier to consider changes and to suggest changes of our own. To review a large pull request (PR), you need time and context as well as the energy to parse and hold your mental boundaries in focus. When working on a team, one of the most inherently difficult and more involved processes is code reviews. Simohamed Marhraoui Follow Vue and React developer | Linux enthusiast | Interested in FOSS Using stacked pull requests in GitHub
0 kommentar(er)
